Pastor Artur Pawlowski wins appeal against Alberta Health Services

Alberta's Court of Appeals ruled that the injunction was "not sufficiently clear and unambiguous," meaning the Pawlowski's contempt of it must be "set aside."

ADVERTISEMENT
Image
Jarryd Jaeger Vancouver, BC
ADVERTISEMENT

In May 2021, Pastor Artur Pawlowski and his brother Dawid were arrested and charged for violating Alberta's public health orders after they held an "illegal" service at their church. Authorities went after the Pawlowskis at the behest of Alberta Health Services, who handed out an ex parte injunction.

On Friday, Alberta's Court of Appeals ruled that the injunction was "not sufficiently clear and unambiguous," meaning the Pawlowski's contempt of it must be "set aside."

"As all elements of contempt must be established beyond a reasonable doubt," the court wrote in its ruling, "we conclude that the injunction here was not sufficiently clear and unambiguous, when it referred to other parties 'acting independently to like effect', so as to apply to the Pawlowskis. The contempt findings against the Pawlowskis must therefore be set aside."

They added that because the contempt findings were dismissed, "the sanction order must also fall," referring to the punishments the Pawlowskis faced as a result of their alleged contempt.

The court ordered that the brothers be reimbursed the $15,733.50 they had since paid to the AHS.

Both Pawlowskis were vocal critics of the province's Covid policies. Artur went viral after a video of him screaming at police to get out of his church made the rounds on social media.

After being charged for refusing to abide by the injunction, the pair were ordered by a judge to "echo medical experts on COVID-19" prior to giving any public addresses. They did not submit to the request, and continued to voice their opposition to the mandates and restrictions.

Restaurant owner Christopher Scott fought alongside the Pawlowskis, refusing to close his business despite numerous warnings from authorities.

He only challenged the sanctions against him, not the injunction itself. The court ruled that the sanctions would be reduced to three days in jail and eight months probation, both of which had already been served, as well as a $10,000 fine.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in to comment

Comments

Powered by StructureCMS™ Comments

Join and support independent free thinkers!

We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.

Support The Post Millennial

Remind me next month

To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
ADVERTISEMENT
© 2024 The Post Millennial, Privacy Policy