US Appeals Court rules that Donald Trump can't block people on Twitter

Trump has used his @RealDonaldTrump account in the past to announce policy, firings, and resignations. It has been the explicit position of the White House that these tweets, a hallmark of Trump’s presidency, bear an official status.

ADVERTISEMENT
Image
Joseph Fang Toronto Ontario
ADVERTISEMENT

A federal appeals court has ruled unanimously that US President Donald Trump can no longer ban critics on his Twitter account. The president, who uses his twitter feed for “all manner of official purposes” was found to be in violation of the first amendment when blocking critics and prohibiting open dialogue.

“The First Amendment does not permit a public official who utilizes a social media account for all manner of official purposes to exclude persons from an otherwise-open online dialogue because they expressed views with which the official disagrees,” wrote Circuit Judge Barrington Parker.

Today’s decision is the result of a case brought forward by Columbia University’s Knight First Amendment Institute. The organization represented seven plaintiffs blocked by Trump, and pointed to a plethora of instances where the president has silenced social media dissidents.

Trump has used his @RealDonaldTrump account in the past to announce policy, firings, and resignations. It has been the explicit position of the White House that these tweets, a hallmark of Trump’s presidency, bear an official status.

This official quality, the court concluded, makes Trump’s account a public forum.

“Public officials’ social media accounts are now among the most significant forums for discussion of government policy,” said the Knight Institute’s director in a statement.

“This decision will ensure that people aren’t excluded from these forums simply because of their viewpoints, and that public officials aren’t insulated from their constituents’ criticism.”

The court considered contemporary dialogue surrounding public officials to have an effervescence “the likes of which have rarely been seen.” The responsibility of politicians rests on fueling this vivacious debate and interchange rather than suppressing it. Even the most disagreeable of opinions should be tackled critically, rather than quieted.

The court's verdict is in line with a 2018 ruling by U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald in Manhattan. Buchwald found that “no government official—including the President—is above the law.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in to comment

Comments

Powered by StructureCMS™ Comments

Join and support independent free thinkers!

We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.

Support The Post Millennial

Remind me next month

To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
ADVERTISEMENT
© 2024 The Post Millennial, Privacy Policy